Use multiple CAs instead of a single self-signed root CA #327
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Santti4go <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Santti4go <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Santti4go <[email protected]>
Santti4go
changed the title
Sure, I targeted Humble because it's the branch I'm working on. |
|
to be honest, i am not sure. having this optional mode seems to be okay but i do not really maintain this repository. @mikaelarguedas could you take a look or ping someone else here? |
|
Friendly ping @mikaelarguedas I've made a few more changes on my end. If we agree this is something we want to support I would happily push them here and target Rolling and then backport it. Let me know what you think. |
Santti4go
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ticket #328
I added a new (optional) flag for the
create_keystorecommand:--split-CAThis flag changes the Certificate Authorities structure creating two new CAs (Permissions CA and Identity CA) instead of using the same self-signed root CA with symlinks.
This is an optional flag and does not change default behavior.
More details in the ticket #328
Note
I still need to sign both new CAs with root CA